JUDGES SHAME ON YOU ALL

Yahoo!7

JUDGES SHAME ON YOU ALL

Create Reply

Page 1 of 3

First Page
< Previous
Next >
Last Page

Sort By:: Newest First; Oldest First

Annette
12 Oct 2011
Sign in to report this post.

Posted Sun 25 Mar 2012 22:09

I was so disappointed with the judges giving high scores still when the pidgeon was not cooked and to add to this- gravel in my foodl!!!! I assure you if I was served that meal in a restaurant sorry but I would send it back that's for sure. Megan and Andy's dish was perfect and superior.

Sally
25 Mar 2012
Sign in to report this post.

Posted Sun 25 Mar 2012 22:14

I agree, megan and andy unfairly lost, they were wonderful competitors great cooks and won 3 cook offs, very unfair

NADA
0 seconds ago
Sign in to report this post.

Posted Sun 25 Mar 2012 22:37

I am so DISAPPOINTED in the judges - every one of you!!

Do you really have any idea of "good food"?

All six of you "judges" should be axed / fired / booted off the show and replaced with professionals!!

Malcolm
22 Jan 2009
Sign in to report this post.

Posted Sun 25 Mar 2012 22:42

So as I understand it the judges role was to rig it so that Megan and Andy won, as they did through the sudden death cook offs.Don't like the result so the competition is rigged?

Alinta
09 Oct 2008
Sign in to report this post.

Posted Sun 25 Mar 2012 22:44

Any idea about "good food"?????

hahahah...if not, perhaps we'd be seeing Thomas and Carla in the finals.....

Annette
12 Oct 2011
Sign in to report this post.

Posted Sun 25 Mar 2012 22:50

oops! sorry didn't mean to write in capital letters

Annahrosse
25 Mar 2012
Sign in to report this post.

Posted Sun 25 Mar 2012 22:58

True!! Wot an a shame... Judges - They're a good cook but their taste buds are contaminated.. Set -ups..

Reginald
0 seconds ago
Sign in to report this post.

Posted Sun 25 Mar 2012 23:02

You all eat under cooked pigeon and two of you eat gravel and the girls go into the final still.
What a joke.

Tim
0 seconds ago
Sign in to report this post.

Posted Sun 25 Mar 2012 23:15

I agree. If these so called 'chefs' and judges think that eating gravel is a minor annoyance that does nothing to detract from a dish then it's quite obvious that they do not care about food at all.

I can GUARANTEE that these guys would more than likely fire anyone that served a meal with rocks in it. Not only would I send it back but I would demand a refund and an apology.

I can see a future 10/10 dish on the show entitled 'glass and bandaid soup'

Layla
21 Dec 2008
Sign in to report this post.

Posted Sun 25 Mar 2012 23:24

Its is a great shame - those small pieces of pegion were so raw -we could see that , I felt sick in my stomach just to see those on the plate . How could they serve it ?
cooks who served raw food won the competetion - such a shameless favouritism !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Andy and Megan you are the real winner .

Paul
18 Dec 2008
Sign in to report this post.

Posted Sun 25 Mar 2012 23:28

Biggest load of rigged #$%$ I have seen. Beaten by 6 points with 3 perfect dishes. And to top it off gravel and under cooked bird. Disgraceful but probably scripted

Hayden
01 Feb 2013
Sign in to report this post.

Posted Sun 25 Mar 2012 23:30

Shame on all the Judges ! ! ! ! ! ! !

I don't believe you have sold out Manu ! ! ! !

What happened to the fair judging ! ! !

Sure the girls were better cooks, but not on the day ! ! ! !

And to the female Judges- Favouritism should not play a part in this compitition ! ! ! !

Very Disappointed on Whoever it is to blame ! ! ! !

Richard
05 Sep 2011
Sign in to report this post.

Posted Sun 25 Mar 2012 23:58

I agree these judges are bias.when you find gravel and two female judges did and gave nines for that also no crispy skin on the duck as well, they only gave a scoreof nine for their desert .

I HAVE WATCHED THIS SHOW EVERY TIME I WILL NOT WATCH ANYMORE OF THIS BIAS #$%$ EVER AGAIN SHAME SHAME SHAME
Was a good show up to now bye bye

Rita
0 seconds ago
Sign in to report this post.

Posted Mon 26 Mar 2012 00:32

I cannot believe that you can serve something with gravel and get such a high score. The duck was not cooked the right way. I am really disappointed in the show. Shame on you. Arrrrrrrrrrrr would you serve sometthing like that in your restaurant. No ................. shame shame shame. Gravel - hair - both unacceptable.

Anne
0 seconds ago
Sign in to report this post.

Posted Mon 26 Mar 2012 00:35

yes, agree, shame shame shame. gravel in food. and get 9s. A JOKE.

Gene
26 Mar 2012
Sign in to report this post.

Posted Mon 26 Mar 2012 00:39

Wonder if at judges were cooking and one of their chiefs served gravel in a dish to any customer ,let alone a food critic

Dags

Sign in to report this post.

Posted Mon 26 Mar 2012 11:53

One wonders what M & A's comments and score would have been like if the judges had found a bit of grit or a bit of shell in their seafood chowder ??

B
0 seconds ago
Sign in to report this post.

Posted Mon 26 Mar 2012 12:02

Well I was very disappointed. Here I thought MKR was different to all other reality programs, but it seems it's all a pre-decided fast too. Amazingly, when Carely and co left a cherry stone in their dish, there was hell to pay and yet the girls win last night? Where is YOUR consistency?? You have lost a fan and I really couldn't be bothered to watch the rest of the series.

B
0 seconds ago
Sign in to report this post.

Posted Mon 26 Mar 2012 12:02

Noyb
10 Apr 2011
Sign in to report this post.

Posted Mon 26 Mar 2012 12:18

It was very obvious that Megan and Andy cooked better on the night. It was shocking to see the girls score so high for their undercooked duck and gravel. Although I wanted the girls to win I believed mkr rigged the scoring because overall the girls are better cooks than Megan and Andy, even though they were not the better cooks last night. Doesn't make it right though.

Little Dee
08 Oct 2008
Sign in to report this post.

Posted Mon 26 Mar 2012 12:21

Annette just a few points relating directly to your post.

1. The pigeon was cooked and not served on the plate raw like you are trying to suggest. Pigeon can safely be served rare and in fact Manu made the comment that it was cooked exactly how he liked it.

2. Only 2 judges had gravel in their food so only 2 could mark it down. They could have only given the main a 4 and a 10 for both dessert and entree and still ended up with an 8 (4+10+10=24. Divide this by 3 and you get 8).

3. As far as Megan and Andy's being perfect and superior it wasn't. With entree they missed out on key ingredients (mint and noodles) and technically it isn't a hard meal to make. With dessert they made the almond tuiles too thick.

Overall Leigh and Jen served up food that was technically superior and from the comments of the judges their flavours were spot on. I think for these reasons it may not have been rigged at all and in fact they deserved to win.

Paul
26 Mar 2012
Sign in to report this post.

Posted Mon 26 Mar 2012 12:30

The judges really are out of touch with reality. I'm pretty sure if you went to a restaurant and had undercooked food with gravel in it, you'd leave in disgust and never return (and make sure everyone knew about it). People go to dinner for a beautiful main dish, not just a fancy dessert. Big fail judges..

Karen
0 seconds ago
Sign in to report this post.

Posted Mon 26 Mar 2012 12:37

I was very disappointed with the judges last night. How obviously rigged was that??? Food not cooked properly and gravel in the food - come on! Leigh and Jennifer may have been better cooks than Megan and Andy overall but not when it counted. If Megan and Andy had left shell in the chowder how well would they have scored? As soon as I heard the first score I knew it wasn't going to be fair

Tigerdicky
0 seconds ago
Sign in to report this post.

Posted Mon 26 Mar 2012 12:44

This show is rigged worse than wrestling! I am sure the two judges who had gravel in their food would have sued if they broke a tooth! The sneer on the frenchmans face said it all when he wished Andy and a Megan a Bon Voyage back to Tassie!

JS

Sign in to report this post.

Posted Mon 26 Mar 2012 13:11

Of course the show is rigged as are all this channels reality shows.How else would Manu have won the dancing with the stars when he could not dance. Then given his pathetic dinner date show which was so bad it was taken off. Many of these so called celebrity chefs are just there for the money and have no integrity. That is why we have some of them on tv now endorsing processed fruit snacks (full of sugar) and Hungary Jacks not to mention WW's and Coles.

Janelle
0 seconds ago
Sign in to report this post.

Posted Mon 26 Mar 2012 13:21

I totally agree , came on to say something , but see you all have said it ... Thought this was about judging on how present and cooking.. you had that dish in restaurant and got gravel in your mouth you be asking for a refund . let alone not cooked

The other group had no faults and had good 3 course meal

That is favouritism at its best shame shame shame